Personal Opinion

What Band of Brothers Taught Me About Character and Strength

I first watched Band of Brothers as a kid, sitting with my brothers, without fully understanding what I was watching. At that age, what stayed with me were the obvious things. The battles. The adrenaline. The courage. It felt intense and heroic, almost unreal.

Recently, I read the book. This time, it landed very differently.

What stayed with me wasn’t the action. It was the repetition. The discipline. The way strength showed up quietly, without needing attention or validation. The more I read, the more I realised that what made these men remarkable wasn’t what they did once, but what they did consistently.

I kept noticing how often strength looked like simply being there. Leadership in Easy Company was rarely loud. Richard Winters didn’t lead by commanding attention or asserting authority. He led by staying steady. By remaining composed when things went wrong. By being predictable in a way that made others feel safe. He absorbed pressure instead of passing it on.

There is something deeply grounding about people like that.

Reading about Winters made me reflect on how much I value steadiness in life. The ability to act with intention instead of impulse. To remain calm under pressure. To carry responsibility without needing recognition.

Lewis Nixon’s story stayed with me for different reasons. He struggled openly. He wasn’t polished or composed all the time. But he stayed. He showed up even when things were difficult. What mattered wasn’t perfection. It was presence. That reminded me that real strength isn’t about having everything under control. It’s about continuing to show up, even when you are tired, uncertain, or carrying your own weight quietly.

Then there was Ronald Speirs. He is often remembered for boldness, but what stood out to me was his clarity. When he acted, there was no confusion. No hesitation. No emotional noise. He didn’t get distracted by what was available or convenient. He focused on what needed to be done. That felt important to me.

It is easy to get carried away by what feels accessible. By what requires the least resistance. By what asks very little of us. It is much harder to stay loyal to your values when discipline feels boring, when restraint feels invisible, and when drifting would be easier. One of the strongest lessons the book left me with was that character is often revealed in restraint. In choosing not to indulge every impulse. In staying aligned even when no one is watching. In remaining consistent, not just when things are exciting, but when they are repetitive and ordinary.

What held Easy Company together wasn’t intensity or emotional display. It was reliability. Shared standards. The quiet understanding that everyone would do their part, day after day. Reading this book made me realise how much my own definition of strength has changed.

I value steadiness more than excitement. Consistency more than intensity. People who don’t disappear when things become dull or difficult. People who stay, not because it is thrilling, but because it is the right thing to do.

Over time, I’ve realised this is what character looks like in practice.

Character isn’t loud.
It doesn’t rush.
And it doesn’t need an audience.

It is built quietly. By staying consistent. By showing up. And by choosing your values, even when it would be easier not to.

Those are the lessons I’m taking with me.

The men in Band of Brothers didn’t speak about character. They lived it, in how they showed up, how they carried responsibility, and how they remained grounded even when circumstances weren’t ideal.

That is what stayed with me.

Personal Opinion

Have We Become Desensitized to Human Suffering?

We get so consumed by work, health, and the constant chase of everyday life that we forget to pause. To reflect. To look deeper into what’s happening around us, not just in our own circles, but in the world at large.

I’ve noticed this in myself too. Some days I’m scrolling through my feed, and I see a heartbreaking image, a child crying in Gaza, a family fleeing their home in fear. For a moment, I feel the weight of it. My chest tightens, I want to scream at the injustice … and then I move on. Another headline. Another video. Another crisis.

And that scares me. Because if I, someone who grew up in a home where world affairs and social issues were discussed daily, can feel myself going numb — what does that say about the world we live in today?

Growing up in Pakistan, news wasn’t just background noise. In my house, it was dinner table/ teatime conversation. Whether it was a natural disaster, political instability, or another global crisis, there was a sense of urgency and empathy in the air. We felt things deeply, and we were encouraged to form our own opinions and voice them on world politics and social issues. I was an active member of welfare organizations, going door to door to collect donations for earthquake victims, or volunteering with animal rights groups. Back then, empathy was action.

Later, when I moved to France for my master’s and then Dubai for work, I noticed a shift not just in myself, but in the life around me. Life became faster. More demanding. More self-focused. Work deadlines, health goals, financial security, they all crept up and started taking over. The tragedies on the other side of the screen became distant. Something to acknowledge briefly, maybe repost on social media, and then get back to the to-do list.

Part of the problem is the sheer amount of information we’re exposed to today. Our phones constantly flood us with breaking news, tragedies, and horrors from every corner of the world. One day it’s Gaza, the next Sudan, then Ukraine, Syria, or Yemen. Each crisis competes for our attention, and in the process, we become overwhelmed. Our brains, trying to protect us, go numb. We scroll past suffering because it feels endless and unsolvable. Meanwhile, the constant stream of entertainment and glamor creates the illusion that life is perfect and worry-free — sometimes it feels like we are living in The Hunger Games, spectators to both tragedy and spectacle.

But there’s also another layer: our busy, demanding lives. We’re stretched thin — trying to balance careers, relationships, health, and our own private struggles. It’s not that we don’t care, it’s that caring feels heavy and like an additional chore. And so, slowly, we stop looking too closely. We mourn a tragedy for 24 hours online, then the next day our feeds are back to workout tips, vacation reels, and coffee aesthetics.

And yet, we can’t afford to look away. When we lose our ability to feel outrage, to empathize, to pause and reflect, we risk losing part of our humanity. I understand that we need to protect our mental peace, but not to the point of becoming desensitized or selfish. Caring may feel heavy, but shutting ourselves off entirely is a risk we cannot take. Genocides don’t stop because the world looks away. Oppression doesn’t end because we’re too busy to notice.

Maybe we can’t solve every crisis. Maybe we can’t carry the weight of the world every single day. But we can remind ourselves to feel — to stay awake and aware. We can talk about these issues, even when the room grows quiet. We can notice when our hearts start to harden, and fight against it. We can choose not to be consumed only by our own struggles or distracted by life’s glamor. We can carry something, even if not everything — whether it’s reading deeply about one issue, donating AED 100, signing a petition, or simply pausing to truly care.

Because at the end of the day, silence and indifference have always been the best allies of injustice.

P.S. The purpose of writing this article is not to put anyone in guilt, but simply to remind us all that our lives have a purpose bigger than ourselves! 🙂

Personal Opinion

New Wave of McCarthyism

So today I read about McCarthyism and found it super interesting and I was convinced to research upon it and here I am now writing on it.

The ideology of McCarthyism was proposed by Joseph McCarthy who was a Republican (US Senator) and was part of Henry Truman’s government. He was of the stance that any communist minded people could be a threat to the sovereignty of US and it was imperative to get rid of them. He believed that most large businesses had explained Roosevelt’s economic policies as being socialist. And that during the unprecedented four terms of President Roosevelt, communists within the US had infiltrated the American state and government.

images (1)

Without giving any logical explanation or proof McCarthy was able to convince Henry Truman that the federal government was crawling with socialists and communists who were working against domestic and international US interests. Due to this mass hysteria dozens of state workers, artists, and others were investigated and demonized. And lobbies who were against public health services claimed that forced vaccination, mental care services and the fluoridation of water were plans of communist world government.

However, Dwight Eisenhower after coming into power realized that this hysteria was doing more damage than good to America’s image and interests. He took initiatives to subside this hysteria. Eventually, McCarthy looked more and more like a demented, egotistical demagogue (this reminds me of stranger things lol) who was discredited by many US journalists.

Now the new research tells that there is a wave of McCarthyism being observed in the American society. Controversial clinical psychologist Professor Jordan Peterson and Lee Jussim found out in their research that there has been a rising tide of leftist intolerance on American campuses. And it has resulted in harassment, violence, directed at speakers from non-left backgrounds. Speakers who present perspectives challenging ‘leftist sacred cows’ such as affirmative action, diversity programs and feminism have been subjected to aggressive proto-authoritarian tactics.

images

Professor Peterson blames post modernism for the intolerance exhibited by the liberals and the new leftists. He describes post modernists as ‘cultural Marxist conspiracy theorists’ who emerged in the 1970s after Marxism failed to win the class war. He adds that post modernists readjusted Marxism’s core axiom of class struggle to other frameworks of perceived group struggles: race, gender, ethnicity etc. So he is of the viewpoint that all subjects that fall under the umbrella of post modernism use unscientific methods to reach conclusions that have more to do with peddling ideologies than intelligence.

The response to the far right would require a more informed and less reactive retort which should involve making pragmatic alliances. But I think that such alliances cannot be made when the new liberal left too spirals into acts of demonization and reckless accusations.

Period.

 

 

 

 

Personal Opinion

Why I still support Imran Khan

“True leaders understand that leadership is not about them but about those they serve. It is not about exalting themselves but about lifting others up.” 

— Sheri L. Dew 

Pakistan has three mainstream political parties right now: PPP, PMLN, and PTI. There are other regional parties and religious outfits too but I believe that they are not capable enough to achieve majority seats.

Now elections in any country is a starting line where journey begins as well as it ends. It is an extended race in which you have to remain on one path/side till the race ends. It is a race in which hurdles are inevitable but you have to necessarily cope with them. Election is vehicle, Constitution is fuel and political parties are drivers and their motto is a path to lead one to his destination. So we have three prominent parties in Pakistan: three drivers, three paths and three destinations. The question is which path to choose and the reason for choosing it? The path which is led by a genuine and reliable person who can be trusted, the path which has least number of hurdles and dacoits than others, the path which favors equality and the path that promises the prosperity and progression of our beloved country.

So, both PML-N and PPP have gained the government three times each and both failed to make Pakistan a progressive and prosperous nation. They became looters of our resources or supporters of them. They became criminals and Ghaadars by defaming the institution (Pakistan army) which remains most sincere to the country.  Thousands of people were killed during their eras. Bribery, nepotism, fraud, money laundering, terrorism and other social evils became custom of the days. So why to choose a path which is full of bloodshed, corruption, injustice and oppression of course?

1406838869a058c-original-1.jpg

So given below are a few reasons which have convinced me to support Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf and vote for it:

c3e76f03cfcbe10906aa846e8a48c67d--imran-khan-top-cats.jpg   imran khanimran khan.jpg

  • I am in love with the ideology for which PTI stands for; which is providing INSAFF (justice) to everyone.
  • Imran Khan has struggled for 22 years to reach this stage, with zero political capital, background or legacy. He stood for a cause to make Pakistan a progressive nation and has remained loyal to it throughout. History tells that he has selflessly and tirelessly worked for public health and education of the under-privileged.
  • He refused close to 200 million pounds sterling as part of his settlement during Jemima’s divorce proceedings. If he was greedy for wealth, well there it was lying at his feet. Even the adjudicating British judge was taken aback at the refusal and had to ask him twice.
  • He is incredibly patriotic and unbelievably determined. The way he supports Pakistan army in his speeches is impressive too. He openly criticized Sharif’s “disloyalty” to the Pakistan army. “I have never seen a leader defaming his own military. There remains no difference between him and Indian Prime minister” said Imran Khan in a recent rally”.
  • He has a clear plan of making public sector institutions independent and free of political control.
  • Imran Khan does not have a history of having had people punished brutally or beaten or attacked. He has not been involved in any indirect or direct criminal activity that ever harmed or took another human’s life. A Big reason for which  support him.
  • Khan’s courage and valor is unquestionable. Barring a bullet-proof jacket, the man hardly has any security. His well-wishers often worry about him for this reason, but he is the fearless man that he is.
  • He plans to give constitutional protection to bureaucrats so they cannot be changed like chess board pieces and work without fear or favor.
  • He plans to make the police totally apolitical and an accountable institution, strong, free of political control, so they can do their jobs without fear or favor.

It is unfortunate that as a nation we have become so used to being led by corrupt leaders  that many of us have turned a blind eye towards the sufferings of our motherland and have accepted dishonest and corrupt leaders. As strange as it may sound but for a lot of people dishonesty and corruption is acceptable, but a straightforward and sincere leader with much less serious mistakes is lambasted. Always remember that our leaders are a reflection of who we are. 

It’s is time that we think rationally and vote wisely for a progressive and prosperous Pakistan! Period.

 

Personal Opinion

Is National security more important than Civil liberties?

This enigma of ‘Civil Liberty or National Security’, is complicated and involves a plethora of different ideas and worldviews. To understand the scope of the question, it is imperative that one must first realize that the liberties under discussion are the modern individual rights such as the freedom of expression, privacy, and the absolute freedom of speech. On the other contrary, is the security of individuals of a society which, at times, is ensured at the expense of civil liberty. The question regarding liberty and National security holds great significance considering the fact that it has been approached many times in the recent years. For instance, the participants of the ‘War on Terror’ enacted laws that suppressed the aforesaid liberties in the name of national securities, such as the Patriot acts after 9/11 in US and the recent cyber-crime bill passed in Pakistan.

Although it is true that national security is, at times, unfairly used by those in power to legitimize their own agendas and that the security has no relation with prosperity, however, it is still more important than civil liberties and should be maintained at all costs. The basic purpose of a country is to provide a secure place to all its nationals. For this specific reason, there is a power structure in every state that strives to maintain law and order. America’s struggle against the British Empire highlights the importance of this obligation. According to the US’s monumental declaration of independence, “it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security” (Jefferson). With this statement the founding fathers legitimized the war against the king of England who failed to ensure security for his subjects residing in the colonies.

pexels-photo-62279-e1496266803782
America’s war of Independence 

Orlando, Dallas, Las Vegas, and Sutherland Springs are few recent appalling events in which mass murderers with guns were involved. In all these scenarios, the liberty and freedom of owning arms and ammunition is putting the security of every American into jeopardy. The reasonable solution, as presented by many lawmakers, is to ban guns. However, the safety and security achieved through such means would come at the cost of civil liberty.

920x920
A gunman opened fire on a music festival in Las Vegas, killing over 20 people. (Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images)

 

Similarly, Pakistani government recently introduced a Cyber Crime bill. The people are viewing these laws skeptically since the bill tends to undermine the freedom of expression on social media and the rest of the cyber world. “The law has alarmed human rights and pro-democracy activists” (“Pakistan passes controversial cyber-crime law” 2). However, though highly objectionable, some clauses of the law are logical. It orders strict action against anti-state elements and those who glorify acts of terror (khan 2). Anti-state elements and terrorist organizations with evil agendas have strong cyber presence and there are many amongst the general populace that have soft corners for these organizations. The only possible way to root out terrorism is to take harsh actions at the cost of civil liberty.

In 2016, a renowned Pakistani political leader, Altaf Hussain (MQM chief), made a hateful speech against the country, its private and public institutions, and other ethnic groups and motivated his followers to do the same. The lawlessness that ensued soon escalated and the security agencies had to step in to clear the situation. The whole incident depicts the misuse of freedom of expression and shows that to achieve national security, certain liberties have to be restricted. A similar event took place in 2007 when militants from Lal Masjid (a famous mosque in Pakistan’s capital, Islamabad), in a bid to establish an Islamic system, challenged the state and Pakistan’s military dictator, Gen Pervaiz Mushraff. These Islamic anarchists provoked hatred against people holding different religious views. Eventually the military stepped in and launched a successful operation against the vigilante group. In this scenario, the military did not accede to the undemocratic and threatening demands of the protesters and in fact took necessary steps to ensure the safety of the entire country and its nationals.

download (1)
Lal Masjid incident 

 

hqdefault.jpg
Islamic anarchists fighting Pakistan army

Another pertinent example to support the importance of national security would be that of Afghanistan. Without a proper structure, the country always stood without any national security and therefore became a battleground for different groups. Taking advantage of the poor conditions, first the soviets then Talibans and then the Americans, interfered in Afghan politics. Their interference descended the entire country into disorder. On the contrary, those who stand in opposition to national security and believe that civil liberty comes first, also present plausible arguments. The America’s Patriot Act, following 9/11, also allows the unjust use of power. Unlawful imprisonment and detainment of American citizens in Guantanamo jail, “privacy violation of anyone who comes into likely contact of the suspect” (Godoy and Abrambson 2), false accusations, religious discrimination and “guilty by association (Godoy and Abrambson 2), are few examples of the ‘Lawful immoral crimes’ carried out by the state, for the sake of national security.

To conclude, this debate regarding national security and civil liberty is going on for ages. Although both sides of the debate present reasonable arguments, the ones in favor of national security outweigh the ones that signify the importance of civil liberties. After understanding the significance of national security, it is safe to say that the unarguable significance of civil liberties is also part of a prosper society. In fact, national security tends to ensure a safe environment in which liberties can be practiced with ease.

Personal Opinion

Remembering Lives Lost In The Peshawar School Attack (144 stories)

 

*May The World’s Darkness Disappear Through The Light Of Mine! May Every Place Light Up With The Sparkling Light Of Mine!* 

 

565c23478599b

Some memories are painful; especially memories of the ones we have lost…

Memories of those who meant the world to us; memories of those who were very dear to us. Memories of the ones who meant so much to us can never be erased and they keep coming back to us in form of flashbacks and for that moment everything comes to a standstill and we tend to remember every minute detail of the time we spent with our loved one. And being in that moment is like reliving the past. But when that moment comes to an end we experience sudden anxiety and heartache. And that is when we cry like a child missing how beautiful life was when they were with us.

Here’s to the memories of 16th December; one of the darkest days in the history of Pakistan. A day when we lost 144 beautiful souls!!!

That day our hearts were broken without a warning, no words were spoken when they were taken away from us. A day when nobody knew that something so tragic would happen that it would completely shatter the dreams of many and leave the entire nation weeping.
No one knew that this day would be marked as one of the deadliest days in the history of Pakistan. 16th December, 2014, being the day when darkness descended upon us, the day when the terrorists struck us where it hurts the most, the day when little angels with beaming faces and high hopes went to school never to come back again, the day when barbaric terrorists brutally massacred innocent children and teachers of Army Public School, the day when classrooms and playgrounds turned into slaughterhouse, the day when many families lost hope and faith in humanity, the day which should never be forgotten because if it is, there would lie no difference between us and them, the terrorists. Alongside the number of martyrs the other thing that saddens me is the dying of their dreams and ambitions.

B7xogR4IAAAxYkD

On this day, let us vow to never end our fight against terrorism. Lets fight till the time we are able to completely eradicate terrorism from our motherland. Let us join in prayer for the families of the children who mourn their loss, and for those who make peace possible in our country.

this7.jpg

 

Personal Opinion

Lawn Industry: A Way Forward

Is the life of a woman in Pakistan just restricted to looking fashionable and pretty? Or is there more to it? Over the last couple of years we have seen a revolution in how women dress themselves and an inevitable hysteria among women regarding clothing brands. Every month we get to know about the launch of some new clothing brand and then further on, the launch of clothes for different seasons in Pakistan. The fact that Pakistan experiences four seasons, namely Summer, Spring, Autumn and Winter has given clothing brands an advantage of launching seasonal collection four to five times a year, Eid collections being an addition to this. Summer collection is always treated as the “MOST WANTED” by the customers and many a times women become impatient when it comes to buying the best “branded” dress for themselves. Also, buying branded clothes with an intention to look better than your aunt’s daughter or with the intention of comparing yourself with the model you saw in a clothing brand’s Ad does not look wise. There has to be a meaningful and a positive approach to why we wear what we wear.

 

Now there are two campaigns which have been successful in giving meaning to why we wear what we wear. And unlike all the previous clothing brand campaigns their creative idea is unique and more meaningful. Let’s first look at Nishat’s campaign, NL-YOU and how it has associated itself with young female generation of Pakistan. What fascinates me about this campaign is how they have empowered women to feel confident and beautiful in their own skin. Also, the fact that they have taken girls who are not recognized models but are girls who come from different professions like for instance, there is a motorbike enthusiast, who has explored Northern Pakistan on her bike (Zenith Irfan), an illustrator from Peshawar (Saheefa Jabbar Khattak), a head-scarf designer (Mahoor Jamal), virtual artists (Alina Tauseef and Samiha Khan) and so many other girls, who may not be fashion icons but are role models for many young girls in Pakistan.

Nishat-Spring-Summer-Campaign-2017-58.jpg

 

I believe that we can relate ourselves better with such role models for they are not models obsessed with a perfect body shape or contoured skin, rather girls who have dreams of travelling the world or opting a career which reveals their various skills and capabilities. Another thing that I truly appreciate about this campaign is how women belonging to different social backgrounds have been shown, for instance you see a girl wearing Hijab and then a girl wearing a sleeveless top. This shows that every girl should be given the choice to wear what she is most comfortable wearing and a dress which brings out the best in her. This is indeed a step towards accepting diversity.

 

Moving on to the second most liked campaign that has addressed the stereotypical imaging of Pakistani women, is that by Gul Ahmad, MeinPerfectHoon. In a very subtle way they have empowered women to feel confident about their so called imperfections, emerging mainly in the form of dark skin tone, crooked nose, and short height etcetera. This campaign is an initiative to change the mindset of people who shatter a woman’s confidence on the basis of unrealistic and self-created beauty standards. Another insight into this campaign is that women should be accepted and respected for who they are and they should be encouraged to follow their dreams and passions rather than restricting their mindset to something as ordinary as looks and beauty. This campaign is a step towards making women realize that beauty is not in the face, rather beauty is a light in the heart!

MeinPerfectHoon

To conclude, both these campaigns have a powerful message to give and I appreciate their step towards giving women more than just clothes; that is to feel confident and beautiful in their own skin. Also, young Pakistani women, especially millennials are driven by career goals, education and values and so the need is to impress them by showing something meaningful and constructive, one which they can relate to.

 

 

 

 

 

Personal Opinion

​Significance of Building a Customer-Focused Company the Right Way!

One of the reasons for which I enjoyed taking Sales Force Management course was because our course’s syllabus was not restricted to any one specific course book or a set of ready-made slides, rather we were given the opportunity to read from different authentic forums, make professional presentations and practically apply our learning of both sales force and consumer behavior concepts to practical life.
This course encouraged me to read extensively and to learn more about how companies successfully apply Sales Force Management concepts in collaboration with other relevant strategies. So I recently read this book called Customer Mania which talks about building a Customer-Focused Company the Right Way! The author of the book has highlighted four points which ensure the success of any company, a success which is not just focused on making money but on building strong relations with customers as well. By drawing on examples from the world’s largest restaurant company, Yum! — owner of KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, Long John Silver’s, and A&W Restaurants — the authors explain how any company, large or small, can develop a unified, people-first, customer-oriented culture. And the most interesting fact was that all the four steps ensuring the company’s success were people related i.e. the primary resource for the success of any company is its workforce and its customers. 

Now let’s talk about the four steps that have been highlighted by Ken Blanchard.  Step one is to set a company’s sight on the right target and vision. Step two is to treat the customers in an amicable way. Step three is to treat the employees in an appropriate manner and the last step is that the company should have a strong type of leadership. 

First step states that a customer-focused company with its sight set on the right target should be the Provider of Choice and should focus on taking care of its customers. Secondly, it should be the Employer of Choice and should aim at creating a motivating environment for its people. Thirdly, it should be the Investment of Choice and should have a register go ca-ching. And the most important thing is having an agreed-upon, compelling vision of the company. 

Coming towards the second step i.e. treating the customers in an amiable way, the company has to make sure that it does whatever it can to satisfy its customers. This in turn would aid them in acquiring customer loyalty in the future. Blanchard has stated this thing several times in the book that the company should listen to what its customers have to say.  The salesmen should be trained to ask questions from the customers in a polite way so as to gain customer trust.  It is very imperative for every company to be creative in discovering what customers want. After knowing what they want it becomes easy for a company to include their suggestions in the company’s vision. By giving them what they want, a company can create raving fans who would brag about how nicely the company treats them. 

Step three is another essential step which is also very much related to what I learned in my sales force management course. This step states that if the company treats the workforce in the right way, only then would the workforce in turn, treat the customers in the right way. For making this cycle work, it is suggested that the company integrates four human systems: recruiting and hiring, training and development, performance management and career planning.  By doing this any company would be successful in recruiting and hiring the right people on the team. Effective training along with constant motivation would help in improving the performance of the workforce. Also, performance management, if done in the right way, would help the workforce in getting help when they need it and in accomplishing their goals which would ultimately lead to the company’s success. 

Last of all is having a plausible kind of leadership.There are two aspects of leadership: vision and implementation. While top leadership sets the vision and direction, anyone who is in a position to influence can be a leader. There are two kinds of leaders. Driven leaders who happen to be self-serving whereas as servant leaders are those who take responsibility of developing a compelling vision; then invert the pyramid and move to the bottom as cheerleaders, supporters and encouragers. Every company should remember that leadership is not about them, rather it’s about serving the vision of the company and people who make it come true. 

In short, this book helped me in knowing how important it is to focus on good customer service which many businesses fail to focus on. Also, the fact that if one gets the title of a leader, it doesn’t mean that one is all-knowing and omnipotent. Every leader should know the art of identifying the strengths of people around him and bringing out the best in each one of them. 

Personal Opinion

Brand yourself!

We talk a lot about brands these days right? Many of us seem to be obsessed when it comes to associating ourselves with brands. If the association with a particular brand is successful,we talk positive about it and vice versa.Sometimes we are way too critical about a brand. Here’s an example : I buy a shirt from some brand and it’s quality is not up to the mark or maybe I don’t like the customer service. So if I come out of the shop dissatisfied, this would eventually lead me to speaking negative about the brand with my family and friends which might discourage them from buying from that particular brand. However my experience could be good too which might make me a loyal customer of that brand and so on. So basically we associate ourselves with different brands almost all the time.

Just like these brands we too create an image of ourselves so that makes us brands too. Here’s an example to explain this point. Think of any brand and then what would it be like if it were a human? Coke? For me cokes human version would be a handsome guy who is popular among his friends for being different in a good way! Samsung? A friendly guy who gets along well with everyone! Now you might perceive these brands differently.

Now think of yourself as a brand! We know how important it is to be known to the world for who we truly are; our strengths, skills and abilities. If you are able to brand yourself well then you would have a great demand in the market. Imagine yourself giving an interview to the CEO of some reputable company. The first thing they will look at would be your attire then how you speak and with time they would want to know who you are, what you are good at and what makes you the best candidate for the job? You will try leaving a super good image of yourself on them. Cool! so basically you are selling yourself as a brand in this scenario. They might hire you for your charismatic personality and excellent analytical plus interpersonal skills. Mission accomplished !

In short, to brand yourself fantastically you should know your strengths and weaknesses, skills and abilities and your goals in life. Also, never brag too much about yourself!

Let the beauty within you come out!!